翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ Codocyte
・ Codognan
・ Codogno
・ Codogno rail crash
・ Codognè
・ Codoi
・ Codoi Township, Lhari County
・ Codolet
・ Codoma ornata
・ Codomain
・ CoDominium
・ Codon (disambiguation)
・ Codon (genus)
・ Codon Adaptation Index
・ Codon degeneracy
Codon usage bias
・ Codona
・ Codona (album)
・ Codona 2
・ Codona 3
・ Codonanthe
・ Codonas Amusement Park
・ CodonCode Aligner
・ Codonoboea
・ Codonocalyx
・ Codonocarpus
・ Codonocheilidae
・ Codonodes
・ Codonopsis
・ Codonopsis lanceolata


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Codon usage bias : ウィキペディア英語版
Codon usage bias
Codon usage bias refers to differences in the frequency of occurrence of synonymous codons in coding DNA. A codon is a series of three nucleotides (a triplet) that encodes a specific amino acid residue in a polypeptide chain or for the termination of translation (stop codons).
There are 64 different codons (61 codons encoding for amino acids plus 3 stop codons) but only 20 different translated amino acids. The overabundance in the number of codons allows many amino acids to be encoded by more than one codon. Because of such redundancy it is said that the genetic code is degenerate. Different organisms often show particular ''preferences'' for one of the several codons that encode the same amino acid- that is, a greater frequency of one will be found than expected by chance. How such preferences arise is a much debated area of molecular evolution.
It is generally acknowledged that codon preferences reflect a balance between mutational biases and natural selection for translational optimization. Optimal codons in fast-growing microorganisms, like ''Escherichia coli'' or ''Saccharomyces cerevisiae'' (baker's yeast), reflect the composition of their respective genomic tRNA pool. It is thought that optimal codons help to achieve faster translation rates and high accuracy. As a result of these factors, translational selection is expected to be stronger in highly expressed genes, as is indeed the case for the above-mentioned organisms. In other organisms that do not show high growing rates or that present small genomes, codon usage optimization is normally absent, and codon preferences are determined by the characteristic mutational biases seen in that particular genome. Examples of this are ''Homo sapiens'' (human) and ''Helicobacter pylori''. Organisms that show an intermediate level of codon usage optimization include ''Drosophila melanogaster'' (fruit fly), ''Caenorhabditis elegans'' (nematode worm), ''Strongylocentrotus purpuratus'' (sea urchin) or ''Arabidopsis thaliana'' (thale cress).
The nature of the codon usage-tRNA optimization has been fiercely debated. It is not clear whether codon usage drives tRNA evolution or vice versa. At least one mathematical model has been developed where both codon-usage and tRNA-expression co-evolve in feedback fashion (''i.e.'', codons already present in high frequencies drive up the expression of their corresponding tRNAs, and tRNAs normally expressed at high levels drive up the frequency of their corresponding codons), however this model does not seem to yet have experimental confirmation. Another problem is that the evolution of tRNA genes has been a very inactive area of research.
== Factors contributing to codon usage bias ==

Different factors have been proposed to be related to codon usage bias, including gene expression level (reflecting selection for optimizing translation process by tRNA abundance), %G+C composition (reflecting horizontal gene transfer or mutational bias), GC skew (reflecting strand-specific mutational bias), amino acid conservation, protein hydropathy, transcriptional selection, RNA stability, optimal growth temperature and hypersaline adaptation.

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Codon usage bias」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.